Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Microsoft Refutes Windows Vista Vulnerability Report - InformationWeek
If Windows View is a malware magnet, it's not Microsoft's fault.
In a on the Microsoft Developer Network blog, Capital Of Texas Wilson, manager of Windows client security merchandise direction at Microsoft, dismissed a by security seller personal computer Tools Software that Windows View was more than vulnerable to malware than Windows 2000.
More Windows Insights
White Papers
Microsoft, Harriet Wilson explained, surveys malware carefully and prints its determinations in its semiannual Security Intelligence Report, which is based on information derived from 450 million usages of the company's Malicious Software Removal Tool (MSRT) each month. In addition, he said, Microsoft carries on such as research in conformity with the diagnostic test methodological analysis prescribed by the Anti Malware Testing Standards Organization (AMTSO).
"Our consequences published in the April 2008 version of the Security Intelligence Report show that Windows View is significantly less susceptible to malware than aged operating systems," said Wilson. "In fact, from June through December 2007, using proportionate numbers, the MSRT establish and cleaned malware from 60.5% fewer Windows Vista-based computing machines than from computing machines running Windows XP with Service Battalion 2 installed."
Wilson noted that the "MSRT establish and cleaned malware from 44% fewer Windows Vista-based computing machines than Windows 2000 SP4 computing machines and 77% fewer than from computing machines running Windows 2000 SP3."
Wilson is not alone in his incredulity of personal computer Tools' report. Dennis Kudin, CTO of Ukraine-based Information Security Center Ltd., also dismissed personal computer Tools' determinations in a Windows Live Spaces . The malware counted in such as surveys often isn't a existent threat, he said. The issue, he claims, is serious threats, malware that tallies at the system meat degree and necessitates administrative privileges.
"Most Windows 2000 users work as decision makers by default, so they are vulnerable to any sort of threats," Kudin wrote. "In Windows View this critical job is solved by User Account Control technology. So View is definitely much more than unafraid than Windows 2000 and I don't understand personal computer Tools' effort to subvert this maxim by far-fetched decisions in their survey."
Labels: austin wilson, intelligence report, malicious software removal, malicious software removal tool, microsoft developer network, pc tools, security intelligence, security vendor, test methodology, windows client, windows vista
